Platform · Graph
Who keeps what running, and what breaks if they don't.
A living map of processes, systems, and the people who actually connect them. See who bridges teams, where a single absence stops a revenue process, and which dependencies nobody had written down, built from what people said and what systems confirm.
How it works
Organizational Graph, step by step.
Nodes
Processes, systems, vendors, and roles become nodes, each linked to the claims that established it.
Edges
Dependencies are drawn from evidence: who touches invoicing, what feeds payroll, where the spreadsheet sits.
Stress
Remove a node and see what loses its only owner, continuity risk made visible before it's tested by events.
Bridge
Find the people who connect teams that would otherwise not talk, the real integration points of the company.
Evidence tiers
Where each claim stands.
Declared
Dependencies people describe in discussions.
Corroborated
Edges confirmed by a second source or a system signal.
Verified
Edges grounded in access grants, data flows, or configurations.
Stated limits
What it will not do.
Will not rank employees.
Will not equate communication volume with performance or importance.
Will not infer who is "replaceable", it shows dependency, not disposability.
Will not expose the graph below the permission level of the viewer.
Features
2 available · 2 in preview · 1 on the roadmap.
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Process & dependency map | Available |
| Key-person continuity view | Available |
| "What breaks if X is unavailable" simulation | Design-partner preview |
| Team-bridge analysis | Design-partner preview |
| Change impact tracing | Roadmap · Q4 2027 |
Questions we actually get
Asked by real skeptics.
Is this people analytics?
Where do the edges come from?
Related
See this pillar inside a real diagnostic.
The two-week engagement uses every pillar above, and hands you the evidence-linked output.